Indian Crypto Exchange Wazirx Calls Binance’s Allegations ‘False and Unsubstantiated’ — Seeks Recourse

Share This Post

Indian Crypto Exchange Wazirx Calls Binance's Allegations 'False and Unsubstantiated' — Plans to Seek Recourse

Indian crypto exchange Wazirx has denied the allegations made by Binance regarding the relationship between the two crypto exchanges. Emphasizing that the allegations “are false and unsubstantiated,” Wazirx stressed. “As far as Binance’s actions are concerned, we are taking the necessary steps to seek recourse and protect our legal rights.”

Wazirx Says Binance’s Accusations Are ‘False and Unsubstantiated’

Wazirx said Tuesday that Binance’s allegations regarding its relationship with Zanmai Labs, allegedly the entity that operates the Indian crypto exchange, are “false” and “misleading.” The company added that it is seeking recourse.

Wazirx wrote on its website:

The allegations made by Binance in their blog are false and unsubstantiated. As far as Binance’s actions are concerned, we are taking the necessary steps to seek recourse and protect our legal rights.

The global cryptocurrency exchange has accused Zanmai of making “a series of misleading claims related to Binance’s alleged role in and responsibility for operating the Wazirx exchange.” Binance said on Friday, Feb. 3: “The false and misleading narrative put forth to the public misrepresented Binance as maintaining control over Wazirx users’ assets, user activity, and the platform’s operations.”

Binance’s announcement followed a public dispute between the two crypto exchanges. In August last year, Wazirx founder Nischal Shetty insisted that Wazirx is owned and controlled by Binance. “Zanmai Labs has [a] license from Binance to operate INR-crypto pairs in Wazirx … Binance operates crypto-to-crypto pairs, processes crypto withdrawal,” he tweeted.

Wazirx Assures Users

The Indian crypto exchange also assured its users regarding Binance’s announcement that Wazirx can no longer use Binance’s wallet services. Emphasizing that users “can continue to trade, deposit, and withdraw their funds as usual,” Wazirx stressed:

Wazirx users do not have to be concerned about Binance’s announcement. We have made arrangements to ensure that Wazirx’s digital assets are stored in accordance with industry-leading standards.

What do you think about the dispute between Wazirx and Binance? Let us know in the comments section below.

Read Entire Article
spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Related Posts

Analyst Says Bitcoin Has Entered The ‘Thrill’ Phase, Here’s What To Expect Next

Crypto analyst Ash Crypto has revealed that Bitcoin has entered the ‘thrill’ phase The analyst further explained what to expect from the flagship crypto moving forward, having entered this phase

Breaking BRICS: Analyst Warns of Trump’s Bid to Weaken Global Alliance

Trump’s foreign policy will target BRICS as its main adversary, aiming to disrupt the coalition and counter the influence of China and Russia, an analyst predicts Analyst Sees the Battlefields of

Can Trump Order A Strategic Bitcoin Reserve? Exploring The Law

At the Bitcoin 2024 conference in Nashville, Donald Trump unveiled his proposal to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR) for the United States upon his return to office The plan has swiftly

Trump Appoints Former SEC Chair to a Role That Could Influence Crypto Oversight

US President-elect Donald Trump has appointed former SEC Chair Jay Clayton to a key role, drawing attention to his crypto regulatory legacy and enforcement record Former SEC Chair Steps Into a Role

WIF Slide Below $3.582 Sparks Fears Of Further Losses

WIF latest dip below the crucial $3582 support has triggered concerns across the market, as bearish sentiment appears to be gathering strength Its break below this key level could pave the way for

Court filings reveal Elon Musk blocked OpenAI’s ICO plans to protect its reputation

Elon Musk revealed in recent court filings that he personally intervened to stop OpenAI from launching an initial coin offering (ICO) in 2018, a move he claimed would have severely damaged the