Menu

Categories:

Hot right now:

Follow on:

Coinsurges provides coverage of fintech, blockchain, and Bitcoin, delivering the most recent news and analyses on the future of money. Stay up-to-date with live prices, charts, and trading options for the top exchanges. Keep track of the day's top cryptocurrency gainers and losers, as well as which coins have experienced gains and losses in the past 24 hours.
Trust Coinsurges as your go-to source for all news and updates in the industry.

Menu

Categories:

Hot right now:

Follow on:

Coinsurges provides coverage of fintech, blockchain, and Bitcoin, delivering the most recent news and analyses on the future of money. Stay up-to-date with live prices, charts, and trading options for the top exchanges. Keep track of the day's top cryptocurrency gainers and losers, as well as which coins have experienced gains and losses in the past 24 hours.
Trust Coinsurges as your go-to source for all news and updates in the industry.

Kamala Harris Finds Ally In Ripple CEO Amid Crypto Backlash

Share This Post

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse wants United States Vice President Kamala Harris to be straightforward on crypto regulation. His comments follow a growing discussion concerning the administration’s digital currency policy and the VP’s withdrawal from Bitcoin Conference 2024.

Many crypto market fans hoped Harris will attend the meeting. They thought it showed her softening on digital currency. David Bailey, the CEO of the world’s biggest Bitcoin conference, disclosed that Harris has decided not to speak at the event.

Kamala Harris Under The Lens

In assessing presidential candidates, Garlinghouse has advocated a break from political bias. His comment followed the observations of Policy Director Justin Slaughter of Paradigm on the possible influence of US Vice President Kamala Harris should she run for president.

Arguing that tribalism and political prejudice have hampered the growth of the crypto sector, Garlinghouse supports a focus on policy ideas instead of political ties.

The remarks of Garlinghouse capture the increasing attitude of crypto leaders who believe that political forces have dominated important policy debates.

“We have to evaluate candidates based on their policy pledges rather than only their party lines,” Garlinghouse said.

This point of view underscores the continuous discussion within the sector on how to negotiate the difficult political terrain that has been, of late, become more intertwined with cryptocurrency.

The Potential Impact Of Harris: A Two-Edged Sword

Slaughter’s most recent X post attracted notice for the major changes Kamala Harris would bring about should she be elected president.

Slaughter claims that Harris is ready to completely replace important national security positions, maybe firing present Biden’s political advisers. This suggested “reformat” has sparked questions over how it would affect US policy on important matters including regulation on Bitcoin and crypto as a whole.

Garlinghouse’s reply to Slaughter’s evaluation exposes both hope and caution. Though he is concerned about Harris’s inclination towards a discourse like that of anti-crypto Senator Elizabeth Warren, he also notes Harris’ broad understanding of Silicon Valley.

This understanding could help to solve the legal obstacles the crypto sector encounters, Garlinghouse said.

Voters On Cryptocurrencies: A Changing Tide

Interestingly, many crypto aficionados have turned to Republican nominee Donald Trump as President Joe Biden’s government, headed by SEC Chair Gary Gensler, comes under fire for strict enforcement policies.

Voters who feel excluded by present rules have found resonance in Trump’s pledges of favorable measures for the crypto industry.

The effect on crypto voters is yet unknown as Harris’s candidature develops. The industry is totally focused on any legislative changes that would either encourage or discourage innovation.

Meanwhile, billionaire Mark Cuban thought Kamala Harris may take a more business-friendly approach to bitcoin and AI. Although not verified, Harris’s advisors say she may be more sympathetic to these enterprises than her prior policies.

All things considered, Garlinghouse’s support of a policy-oriented approach mirrors a larger movement among the crypto community for more complex political assessments. The argument on how best to help the sector among changing political environments develops as the US presidential election draws near.

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Read Entire Article
spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Related Posts

Phoenix Group Boosts Ethiopia Bitcoin Mining Capacity to 132 MW

Phoenix Group has expanded its Bitcoin mining operations in Ethiopia, securing an additional 52 megawatts, bringing its total capacity there to 132 megawatts and surpassing 500 megawatts globally

Dogecoin Price To $10? Why The 21Shares ETF Filing Could Signal Good Things To Come

The conversation surrounding Dogecoin may be gradually shifting, and recent market developments suggest that the meme coin could be poised to reach new all-time highs The most recent development

Ripple’s reported $5 billion offer for Circle rejected as too low

Ripple has proposed a takeover of Circle, offering between $4 billion and $5 billion to acquire the stablecoin issuer, Bloomberg News reported on April 30, citing sources familiar with the matter 

XRP Price Suppressed By ‘Dark Pools,’ Crypto Pundit Claims

The recent stagnation in XRP’s spot price may owe less to waning market interest than to a surge in off-exchange trading, according to crypto pundit and Digital Ascension Group managing director

Markets Bet on Fed Pause in May Even as Trump Rattles the Cage

On April 12—just over two weeks prior—expectations surrounding a potential cut to the federal funds rate were in flux, with markets assigning a 398% probability that the US Federal Reserve would

Breaking: Circle Rejected Ripple Takeover Bid of $4-5B

The post Breaking: Circle Rejected Ripple Takeover Bid of $4-5B appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Circle ostensibly turned down the offer since it was too low based on its market value and