Staking via hardware crypto wallet: Ledger exec explains how it works

Share This Post

Hardware wallet-based staking offers more security and freedom than staking via software wallets and crypto exchanges, according to the head of Ledger Enterprise.

As cryptocurrency staking is growing increasingly popular, one may wonder about staking opportunities of not only crypto exchanges or software wallets but also hardware wallets.

By definition, staking allows investors to earn crypto without selling their holdings but rather by delegating crypto to a staking validator to support a blockchain. Originating from the word “stake,” the staking process refers to gaining profits and an associated passive income from crypto through a consensus mechanism known as proof-of-stake (PoS), as opposed to the mining-based proof-of-work (PoW) mechanism of Bitcoin (BTC).

Amid the growing popularity of PoS, staking has been growing quite popular on online crypto exchanges and software wallets, with many trading platforms actively adopting the feature. Some hardware wallet providers have been integrating the staking feature into their portable physical devices as well.

Ledger, a major hardware cryptocurrency wallet supplier, has been actively working on its crypto staking features since debuting staking in 2019.

On Monday, Ledger introduced staking for Solana (SOL), allowing investors to earn SOL by committing the cryptocurrency to support the Solana network.

The new staking feature is enabled on the Ledger Live application in cooperation with the blockchain service Figment, which provides nodes for staking using the Ledger validator. The latest staking addition joins six coins already available for staking on Ledger Live, including Ether (ETH), Tezos (XTZ), Polkadot (DOT), Cosmos (ATOM), Algorand (ALGO) and others.

Staking via hardware wallets vs software wallets and exchanges

Staking coins through a hardware wallet has a number of peculiarities compared to staking via software wallets or crypto exchanges, Alex Zinder, head of Ledger Enterprise, told Cointelegraph.

“The main difference between staking on a software wallet versus staking with a hardware wallet is security,” Zinder said, noting that hardware wallets remain the “safest way for users to maintain full control of their digital assets.”

“When staking with a software wallet, you own your coins, as you own your private keys, but the security of your coins is dependent on an external source of security,” Zinder stated. The security of coins staked on software wallets depends on the security of the user’s computer or smartphone, the exec added.

In contrast to staking on crypto exchanges, staking via hardware wallets allows investors to own and control their crypto holdings truly, as well as offers the freedom to choose a validator, the Ledger executive said. On the other hand, staking with an exchange is easier because such type of staking requires fewer steps to follow, Zinder noted. “You don’t need the level of education required to choose between different validators,” he added.

Crypto always remains online, even on a hardware wallet

As hardware crypto wallets are designed to provide a form of offline storage for crypto, the process of staking coins via such wallets is sometimes referred to as “cold staking,” as opposed to “online staking” via exchanges.

At the same time, storing crypto on a hardware wallet doesn’t mean that crypto itself is offline, Zinder pointed out, stating:

“It’s critical for everyone to understand that your crypto always remains online on the blockchain even when utilizing a hardware wallet. When we talk about hardware wallets, we’re talking about private keys that are stored in a secured chip in the hardware wallet.”

“When signing a transaction, such as delegating your coins to a validator, that message is transmitted through the secure element, signed on the Nano, and then sent to the blockchain,” the exec added.

Related: Noncustodial Bitcoin wallets unbannable, says exec behind Trezor wallets

A hardware wallet is a type of noncustodial crypto wallet designed to grant the user full control of the owned crypto. Contrary to custodial wallets, noncustodial wallets remove the need to rely on a third party that could recover, freeze or seize the user’s crypto assets. This makes the user solely responsible for storing the private keys in order to access crypto holdings.

With a hardware wallet, the user gets a device to store a cryptocurrency wallet and private keys. However, the user still has to keep the private keys safely offline as well.

Read Entire Article
spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Related Posts

Bitcoin Price Holds Above $68,000, But TD Sequential Sounds Sell Alarm

The Bitcoin price has not quite been able to replicate its midweek form over the weekend, hovering around the $68,000 level Despite the quiet performance in the past day, the premier cryptocurrency

Yellow Card Raises $33M to Expand Stablecoin Presence in Africa

Yellow Card, a leading African stablecoin platform, closed a $33 million Series C funding round led by Blockchain Capital The funding signifies a milestone for Yellow Card and the African fintech

BRICS Summit to Far Surpass US Presidential Election in Global Importance, Russian Official Claims

The BRICS summit, not the US presidential election, will be the defining event of global history, a Russian official claims With BRICS expanding and 65% of its transactions now in national

TRON Market Cap Hits Nearly $14 Billion On Strong Revenue Growth

TRON, with its native token TRX, has been on a tear in the last few months, with its impressive market cap growth Based on Messari’s tracking for Q3 2024, TRX’s market capitalization increased by

Samson Mow Urges German Lawmakers To Embrace Bitcoin – Here’s Why

Samson Mow, founder of Bitcoin-focused company JAN3, recently addressed the German Bundestag in an effort to push for the state to adopt Bitcoin, thus pushing for “hyperbitcoinization”

Web3 Markets in Infancy, Viewed as ‘Lottery’ by Investors, Says Finance Veteran

Web3 markets remain in their early stages, with many participants viewing them as a “lottery,” according to Artur Guliński, co-founder of Orbitt This trend is particularly evident in