SBF does not see Bitcoin becoming a payment network, lampoons its energy consumption

Share This Post

Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the CEO and founder of leading crypto exchange FTX,  said in a recent interview with the Financial Times that he does not think Bitcoin has a future as a payment network. 

SBF continued that the environmental impact of Bitcoin mining, alongside the fact that the coin is “inefficient,” would count against it in the long run.

PoS networks are the future of payments

SBF said digital currencies running on proof of stake networks like Solana, Avalanche, and others are the future of payment networks. 

He added that these networks already have the advantage of lower energy consumption and cheaper costs. So, they could be forced to evolve into the choice network for crypto payment.

In his words,

The Bitcoin network is not a payments network, and it is not a scaling network. Things that you’re doing millions of transactions a second with have to be extremely efficient and lightweight and lower energy cost. Proof of stake networks are.

In 2021, Avalanche founder Emin Gün Sirer said that Bitcoin could become obsolete as newer blockchains like Ethereum, Solana, and others have multiple use-cases.

In his view, Bitcoin’s “speed,” alongside the fact that the blockchain does not host smart contracts, makes it difficult for decentralized applications to be built on top. 

SBF believes these shortcomings would allow Bitcoin to “be taken over by other systems that are growing.”

Bitcoin is a store of value

However, SBF didn’t entirely dismiss Bitcoin. He believes the crypto king has a future as “an asset, a commodity and a store of value.”

SBF’s view is not entirely surprising; some crypto community members also think that the flagship digital currency is more of a store of value than a payment option.

The billionaire also rehashed the usual criticism against Bitcoin, saying that the community has to work to avoid 

Spending 100 times as much eventually as we are today on energy costs for mining.

Meanwhile, Greenpeace, a non-profit environmental organization, called for a change to the Bitcoin consensus model in a campaign tagged “Change the Code, not the Climate” in March.

However, the Bitcoin community reacted negatively to the campaign, saying that changing the coin’s code would have a ripple effect on the network’s architecture and jeopardize its security.

The post SBF does not see Bitcoin becoming a payment network, lampoons its energy consumption appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Read Entire Article
spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Related Posts

Russia Vows to Launch Domestic Payment System to Render Western Sanctions Obsolete

Russia is determined to create a domestic payment system to conduct trade and international transactions free from current disruptions Mikhail Mishustin, Prime Minister of Russia, stated that this

Bitcoin Powers Wealth: Nearly 50% Of Crypto Millionaires Owe Success To BTC

Between 2023 and 2024, the number of Bitcoin millionaires climbed by almost 111%, reaching 85,400 or 496% of all crypto millionaires in 2024 Regarding cryptocurrency billionaires, five of the six

FLOKI Breaks Out Of Downtrend: Analyst Predicts 200% Rally To New All-Time High

Meme coin FLOKI has also benefited from recent inflows into the crypto markets, which has left many cryptocurrencies posting gains in both the 24-hour and seven-day timeframes  Notably, this inflow

Stripe Acquires Stablecoin Platform Bridge in Record $1.1 Billion Crypto Deal

Payments company Stripe has acquired stablecoin platform Bridge in a $11 billion transaction, marking the largest acquisition in the crypto industry to date Techcrunch founder Michael Arrington

Farm, Craft, and Thrive in My Neighbor Alice

Follow Regina in her journey down the rabbit hole that is My Neighbor Alice Will she find a wonderful land, or will it be a bore Read on to find out Last episode’s quick recap I’m still

Vitalik Buterin lays down roadmap to minimize centralization risk in Ethereum POS design

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin believes that the centralization of proof-of-stake (POS) poses a significant threat to Ethereum POS centralization is where large stakers dominate and small