Leaked Personal Data of 1 Billion Chinese Citizens on Sale for 10 Bitcoins — Hacker Claims Stolen From Shanghai Police

Share This Post

Leaked Personal Data of 1 Billion Chinese Citizens on Sale for 10 Bitcoins — Hacker Claims Stolen From Shanghai Police

A hacker claims to have stolen the personal data of a billion Chinese citizens from the Shanghai National Police (SHGA) and is selling it for 10 bitcoins. “This database contains many TB of data and information on billions of Chinese citizens.”

23 Terabytes of Data on a Billion Chinese Citizens on Sale for 10 Bitcoins

An anonymous hacker has claimed to have stolen about 23 terabytes of data on a billion Chinese citizens from a Shanghai police database. Experts say that, if true, this would be one of the biggest data breaches in history.

The data is being offered for sale for 10 bitcoins. At the time of writing, this sum amounts to about $197,806.

On a hacker forum, an anonymous user using the handle “Chinadan” offered the data for sale on Thursday. The user claimed that the information was leaked from the Shanghai National Police (SHGA) database. “This database contains many TB of data and information on billions of Chinese citizens,” the post details.

The leaked data includes names, addresses, birthplaces, national ID numbers, mobile numbers, as well as crime and case details.

The user shared a sample of 750,000 records to allow interested buyers to verify that the data for sale is not fake.

On Monday, Binance CEO Zhao Changpeng (CZ) tweeted:

Our threat intelligence detected 1 billion resident records for sell in the dark web, including name, address, national id, mobile, police and medical records from one asian country.

Leaked Personal Data of 1 Billion Chinese Citizens on Sale for 10 Bitcoins — Hacker Claims Stolen From Shanghai Police

“Likely due to a bug in an Elastic Search deployment by a gov agency … It is important for all platforms to enhance their security measures in this area,” he continued, adding that “Binance has already stepped up verifications for users potentially affected.”

The Binance chief further explained Monday: “Apparently, this exploit happened because the gov developer wrote a tech blog on CSDN [China’s Software Developer Network] and accidentally included the credentials. 1 billion records of private citizens’ data.”

What do you think about this data leak? Let us know in the comments section below.

Read Entire Article
spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Related Posts

Retail Bitcoin Activity Hits a Low—Cryptoquant Report Explores What Is Next for Markets

Retail bitcoin investors are slowly making a comeback, though their demand growth continues at a sluggish pace compared to historical standards Data from Cryptoquant reveals that small-scale

Hester Peirce’s Potential SEC Chairmanship: A New Era for Ripple and Crypto?

The post Hester Peirce’s Potential SEC Chairmanship: A New Era for Ripple and Crypto appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Former President Donald Trump recently hinted that he might nominate

Kraken Set to Dive Into Blockchain Waters With Its Own Chain, ‘Ink’

Kraken is setting its sights on launching its own blockchain next year, much like Coinbase’s Base chain, according to a report from Bloomberg’s Olga Kharif The new network, which is

Retail Surge Sparks Bearish Outlook As Bitcoin Dominance Declines

The cryptocurrency market’s recent dominance by Bitcoin has decreased below 50%, indicating a potential adverse trend as retail activity increases This change prompts inquiries regarding market

Dogecoin Price Set To Break Out Of Long-Term Consolidation For 800% Gains, DOGE Rival Eyes 19,820% In 3 Months

The Dogecoin price is on the rise The meme-inspired cryptocurrency has been a hot topic as its price has increased, and massive trading volumes have begun attracting many new crypto traders Looking

CEO Brad Garlinghouse Says Ripple Made A Mistake With The SEC, Here’s Why

In a recent interview, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse admitted that the payments technology company should have done better with its relations with regulators in the United States in the early days of