SEC hits BlockFi with a $100 million penalty, gives 60 days to comply with a 1940 law

Share This Post

The penalty comes after months of heightened regulatory attention to crypto lending platforms.

On Feb. 14, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, announced actions against crypto lending company BlockFi over its failure to register high-yield interest accounts that the agency deems to be securities.

New Jersey-based BlockFi will pay $50 million in settlement to the SEC and another $50 million to 32 U.S. states that brought similar charges. These are some of the heaviest penalties ever imposed by a U.S. federal regulator on a cryptocurrency service provider. The firm also agreed to stop onboarding new customers to the unregistered service, BlockFi Interest Accounts, and attempt to bring it into compliance with the Investment Company Act of 1940 within the next 60 days.

BlockFi Interest Accounts, launched in March 2019, allowed investors to lend their crypto assets to the platform in exchange for monthly interest payments of up to 9.5% — significantly higher rates than interest-bearing deposit accounts in most traditional financial institutions offer.

Despite the widespread critique that securities laws written in the 1930s and 1940s could have limited applicability to digital asset-based products, SEC chairman Gary Gensler lauded the settlement as an instructive precedent for crypto lending platforms. Gensler said in a statement:

“Today’s settlement makes clear that crypto markets must comply with time-tested securities laws, such as the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940. It further demonstrates the Commission’s willingness to work with crypto platforms to determine how they can come into compliance with those laws.”

Cryptocurrency lending products began attracting increased scrutiny from both federal and state regulators last September. According to a January report, the SEC was investigating products similar to BlockFi Interest Accounts offered by Gemini, Celsius Network and Voyager Digital to determine whether these offerings constituted securities.

Read Entire Article
spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Related Posts

JPMorgan Casts Doubt on Elon Musk’s D.O.G.E. Pursuit of Federal Reform

JPMorgan has warned the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) will face significant hurdles, citing Congress’ control over spending Elon Musk’s DOGE Sparks Debate as JPMorgan

XRP Price Reaches 3-Year High At $1.6 – 2 Ways It Can Go From Here

The XRP price recently surged to a three-year high of $16, marking a significant milestone in the cryptocurrency’s recent bullish rally This remarkable price movement has garnered the attention

From Premiums to Discounts: Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Splits Global Markets

In the past week, the crypto market has been buzzing with action, with bitcoin smashing its way to a new all-time high of $99,800 per coin on Thursday Data reveals an intriguing dynamic during this

XRP Analyst Sets $2 Target If It Holds Key Level – Can It Reach Multi-Year Highs?

XRP has emerged as a standout leader in the recent crypto rally, delivering massive gains and fueling optimism among investors The price has skyrocketed by an astonishing 225% in under three weeks,

Latam Insights: El Salvador’s Bitcoin Debt Idea, Milei’s MAGA

Welcome to Latam Insights, a compendium of the most relevant crypto and economic news from Latin America over the past week In this issue, Max Keiser floats an idea to allow El Salvador to acquire

XRP Below $1? Not Happening, Claims Millionaire Analyst

Ripple’s XRP has traded below the $1 level for nearly three years, affected primarily by the cases filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Even during the mini bull run immediately