Singapore’s financial watchdog considers further restrictions on crypto

Share This Post

The Monetary Authority of Singapore may consider “placing limits on retail participation” for investors, as well as introduce rules on the use of leverage for crypto transactions.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore, or MAS, has been “carefully considering” adding restrictions that could affect how retail investors handle crypto, according to one of the government’s senior ministers.

According to parliamentary records published on Monday, Singapore senior minister and MAS chair Tharman Shanmugaratnam said the financial watchdog may consider “placing limits on retail participation” for crypto investors as well as introducing rules on the use of leverage for crypto transactions. Shanmugaratnam also called for regulatory clarity among financial regulators around the world, “given the borderless nature of cryptocurrency markets.”

In January, the MAS barred crypto service providers from advertising or marketing in public spaces, and was behind regulations to shut down crypto ATMs in Singapore — services that seemingly show “cryptocurrency trading being portrayed in a manner that trivialises its risks.” According to the MAS, the country’s Payment Services Act empowers the regulator to impose additional restrictions on crypto service providers ”to ensure better consumer protection, and to maintain financial stability and safeguard the efficacy of monetary policy.”

The financial watchdog said that “recent events” — likely referring to extreme volatility in the prices of major cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin (BTC) — highlighted the risks of crypto investments. On June 30, the MAS reprimanded Three Arrows Capital for allegedly “providing false information and exceeding assets under management threshold.” The Singapore-based company may be facing liquidation amid reports it failed to meet margin calls from its lenders.

Related: Why Singapore is one of the most crypto-friendly countries

Amid the market downturn, the MAS continues to consider giving the regulatory green light to companies handling digital assets in Singapore. In June, the financial regulator granted Crypto.com an in-principle approval, allowing the crypto exchange to provide certain payment services in the country. Crypto companies including Bitstamp Limited, Coinbase Singapore and Gemini Trust have been granted exemptions for having a license in Singapore, while Binance announced plans to shutter its operations in the country in February.

Read Entire Article
spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Related Posts

Retail Bitcoin Activity Hits a Low—Cryptoquant Report Explores What Is Next for Markets

Retail bitcoin investors are slowly making a comeback, though their demand growth continues at a sluggish pace compared to historical standards Data from Cryptoquant reveals that small-scale

Hester Peirce’s Potential SEC Chairmanship: A New Era for Ripple and Crypto?

The post Hester Peirce’s Potential SEC Chairmanship: A New Era for Ripple and Crypto appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Former President Donald Trump recently hinted that he might nominate

Kraken Set to Dive Into Blockchain Waters With Its Own Chain, ‘Ink’

Kraken is setting its sights on launching its own blockchain next year, much like Coinbase’s Base chain, according to a report from Bloomberg’s Olga Kharif The new network, which is

Retail Surge Sparks Bearish Outlook As Bitcoin Dominance Declines

The cryptocurrency market’s recent dominance by Bitcoin has decreased below 50%, indicating a potential adverse trend as retail activity increases This change prompts inquiries regarding market

Dogecoin Price Set To Break Out Of Long-Term Consolidation For 800% Gains, DOGE Rival Eyes 19,820% In 3 Months

The Dogecoin price is on the rise The meme-inspired cryptocurrency has been a hot topic as its price has increased, and massive trading volumes have begun attracting many new crypto traders Looking

CEO Brad Garlinghouse Says Ripple Made A Mistake With The SEC, Here’s Why

In a recent interview, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse admitted that the payments technology company should have done better with its relations with regulators in the United States in the early days of